内容简介

One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, 'we have no theory'. Frankfurt, one of the world's most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all. Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner's capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.


Harry G. Frankfurt is a professor of philosophy emeritus at Princeton University. His books include The Reasons of Love; Necessity, Volition, and Love; and The Importance of What We Care About. He lives in Princeton, New Jersey.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 一個死槍槍
    "Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial-notoriously less stable and less inherent than the natures of other things. and insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit."2016-01-22
  • moviejunkie
    真真bullshit。豆瓣评论比书本身有意思。2012-10-19
  • Wonderstruck
    作者对bullshit的探讨并未深入到语言哲学的层次,基本上是从日常语境的角度进行探讨,但实际上对bullshit的探讨还可以延展到对逻辑悖论的研究。日常生活的bullshit和逻辑悖论,实际上具有很大的相似性,对后者的探讨也更加深入语言和人类的一些本质问题。在本书的末尾,作者对于怀疑论者的简单解决方案—即“既然我们无法彻底认知外界而得出对于真实与虚假的判断,那么便诉诸内心,让自己达到真诚。”作出了简洁而有力的质疑,的确,一个严谨的怀疑论者应当认识到怀疑论是无处不在的,不仅存在于本身对外界的理解,也存在于自己对自身的理解之中,但是作者仅仅提出了质疑而没有提供解决方案。我不知道其他哲学家有没有对怀疑论的这种困境提出有效的解决方案,如果没有,就让我来吧。2019-10-29

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢