内容简介

A wondrous nonfiction debut from the cofounder of NPR’s Invisibilia, Why Fish Don’t Exist tells the story of a 19th-century scientist possessed with bringing order to the natural world—a dark and astonishing tale that becomes an investigation into some of the biggest questions of our lives.

When Lulu Miller was starting out as a science reporter, she encountered a story that would stick with her for a decade. It was the strange tale of a scientist named David Starr Jordan, who set out to discover as many of the world’s fish as he could. Decade by decade, he built one of the most important specimen collections ever seen. Until the 1906 San Francisco earthquake hit—sending over a thousand of his fish, housed in fragile glass jars, plummeting to the floor. In an instant, his life’s work was shattered.

Miller knew what she would do if she were in Jordan’s shoes. She would give up, give in to despair. But Jordan? He surveyed the wreckage at his feet, found the first fish he recognized, and painstakingly began to rebuild his collection. And this time, he introduced one clever innovation that, he believed, would protect it against the chaos of the world.

In Why Fish Don’t Exist, Miller digs into the passing anecdote she once heard about David Starr Jordan to tell his whole story. What was it that kept him going that day in 1906? What became of him? And who does he prove to be, in the end: a role model for how to thrive in a chaotic world, or a cautionary tale? Filled with suspense, surprise, and even a questionable death, this enchanting book interweaves science, biography, and a dash of memoir to investigate the age-old question of how to go on when everything seems lost.


Louisa Elizabeth Miller, better known as Lulu Miller, is an American writer, artist, and science reporter for National Public Radio. Miller's career in radio started as a producer for the WNYC program Radiolab. She now co-hosts the NPR show Invisibilia with Alix Spiegel.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 撒冷的乌凌
    文不对题,应该改名叫《大卫·斯塔尔·乔丹传:斯坦福轶事以及它如何改变了我的生活》。关于鱼的部分简短到令人发指,涉及的概念也很简单:鱼并不是一个科学精确的分类。关于Jordan的部分复杂而深刻。非常不喜欢关于作者自己的部分,一方面穿插自己的故事把整本书切得很碎(而且情绪性大于故事性),另一方面非要联系到人生意义的寻找而落入俗套。鱼的故事不需要和人产生联系也可以精彩,Jordan的故事不需要和作者产生联系也可以好看。2023-01-17
  • 能吃能睡不能动
    为最后的秀恩爱多加一星哈哈哈。2023-10-22
  • Akira
    看到一半弃,不想再多花一小时。3.5最多,失望。抱着科普的期待来的,结果看了一堆八卦流水账。当我反应过来她引导读者默认主角是无名小卒立刻觉得太刻意搞叙诡不会是啥正经科普。对多线多主题交叉讲述并不陌生,今年刚读完写作方式非常类似的一本,复调,恕我直言比这本不知道高到哪里去了。是,失去七年的恋人让她很痛苦寂寞,但她自己的故事和科学家的哪个都不打动我,新幸福也是一股中产美剧的速食味。对人性反思相当一般,无非就是复杂多面动机单纯童年阴影适时放手增熵宿命。主题间的联系很浅弱。从思考深度上,鱼不存在,无非就是玫瑰的名字,但见识过同名小说中的老登豪尔赫这Jordan又算个啥,还被描述得轴的要命。她是真不太了解男人,也不了解她科学家父亲,前后那么多事她就关注jar和tag,分析收集癖心理。立靶子射箭了属于。2023-10-17

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢