内容简介

For many years scholars have sought to explain why the European states which emerged in the period before the French Revolution developed along such different lines. Why did some become absolutist and others constitutionalist? What enabled some to develop bureaucratic administrative systems, while others remained dependent upon patrimonial practices? This book presents a new theory of state-building in medieval and early modern Europe. Ertman argues that two factors - the organisation of local government at the time of state formation and the timing of sustained geo-military competition - can explain most of the variation in political regimes and in state infrastructures found across the continent during the second half of the eighteenth century. Drawing on insights developed in historical sociology, comparative politics, and economic history, this book makes a compelling case for the value of interdisciplinary approaches to the study of political development.


Thomas Ertman

Associate Professor of Sociology; Director of Undergraduate Studies

Ph.D. 1990, M.A. 1985, B.A. 1981, Harvard University.

Office Address: 295 Lafayette St., Room 4110

Phone: (212) 998-8359

Email: thomas.ertman@nyu.edu

Areas of Research/Interest: Comparative/historical sociology; political sociology; social theory; sociology of the arts.

Bio:

For as far back as I c...

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 晓鸣
    Most comprehensive and insightful masterpiece of state formation theories 2017-12-10
  • 1881cn
    比较历史社会学的代表作。对于不同类型国家形成的原因做了精致的分析。但遗憾的是,在政治科学家看来,this is just a story, far away from political science. 2014-02-26
  • 百无一用
    为了写comparative analysis Memo着重读了有关西班牙的部分。但整本书的研究问题是我本科时候很感兴趣的topic。对于我这个没有社会学基础的读者来说分析方法有点陌生。三个想法:1. 很喜欢将地缘政治冲突时间作为变量的观点 2. 感觉将欧洲Christanity详细阐述而不是作为整体的预设会更严谨 3. 帝国的殖民贸易是不是也可以纳入讨论?(可能相交于作者的两个变量来说有点跑题)但还是难以想象这是博士论文……2024-01-18

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢