内容简介

Development, it is generally assumed, is good and necessary, and in its name the West has intervened, implementing all manner of projects in the impoverished regions of the world. When these projects fail, as they do with astonishing regularity, they nonetheless produce a host of regular and unacknowledged effects, including the expansion of bureaucratic state power and the translation of the political realities of poverty and powerlessness into "technical" problems awaiting solution by "development" agencies and experts. It is the political intelligibility of these effects, along with the process that produces them, that this book seeks to illuminate through a detailed case study of the workings of the "development" industry in one country, Lesotho, and in one "development" project.

Using an anthropological approach grounded in the work of Foucault, James Ferguson analyzes the institutional framework within which such projects are crafted and the nature of "development discourse," revealing how it is that, despite all the "expertise" that goes into formulating development projects, they nonetheless often demonstrate a startling ignorance of the historical and political realities of the locale they are intended to help. In a close examination of the attempted implementation of the Thaba-Tseka project in Lesotho, Ferguson shows how such a misguided approach plays out, how, in fact, the "development" apparatus in Lesotho acts as an "anti-politics machine," everywhere whisking political realities out of sight and all the while performing, almost unnoticed, its own pre-eminently political operation of strengthening the state presence in the local region.


James Ferguson is an associate professor of anthropology at the University of California at Irvine.

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • E&A
    看完以后再也不想去world bank工作2017-08-11
  • 廖芜
    rethinking development: the contradiction of expanding state bureaucratic power while pushing depoliticization, state (not a coherent entity) as coordination and multiplication of power relations2020-03-23
  • 电胆马
    問題化和渲染技術的實踐並不是分開的。 正如James Ferguson在他對萊索托發展的具有里程碑意義的研究中所解釋的那樣,適用於干預的“可理解領域”的界定和特徵預示著專家必須提供的各種干預類型。問題的識別與解決方案的可用性密切相關。它們共同出現在政府機構中,在政府機構中,某些診斷、處方和科技可供受過適當培訓的專家使用。相反,“提供科技”的做法確認了專業知識,並構成了那些被定位為受託人、有能力診斷他人缺陷的人和受專家指導的人之間的界限。這是一個必須保持的邊界,也是一個可以挑戰的邊界。2019-04-16

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢