内容简介

This is a collection of articles dealing with the point of view of symbolic interactionism and with the topic of methodology in the discipline of sociology. It is written by the leading figure in the school of symbolic interactionism, and presents what might be regarded as the most authoritative statement of its point of view, outlining its fundamental premises and sketching their implications for sociological study. Blumer states that symbolic interactionism rests on three premises: that human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings of things have for them; that the meaning of such things derives from the social interaction one has with one's fellows; and that these meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretive process.


Herbert George Blumer earned his doctorate in 1928 at the University of Chicago and went on to teach there until 1951. He later became the founding chair of the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1983 the American Sociological Association honored him with its Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award, acknowledging the importance of his codifi...

下载地址

豆瓣评论

  • 薇乐理
    比Schutz写得容易懂多了……关键词,interpretation,meaning,symbol2017-11-05
  • 廿之
    想了很久I和me的概念,跟ego和id有什么区别,同样是self的组成,又同样是主我与客我,解构之后大约是前者更在乎self和community的互动。解构不能成为目的,可这种探究虽无意义却很有趣。ps. Significant other真的是个太值得回味的词,既significant又是other. 2019-06-16
  • sumi_
    至少在我们这些二级学科,那些声称自己用符号互动论的人,很少会回到布鲁默那里,必定会提米德和戈夫曼。布鲁默却是真正提出了symbolic interactionism术语的人,但也就大概到这儿了,三个原则,人根据意义行动,意义来自互动,意义在互动中修正。这在微观层面很管用,具有generic的特点。但放在中观和宏观就不太能通顺了。我还是觉得是他所在的时代将他推到了伟大的位置,比较遗憾的一点是,这位讲方法论的老师自己不怎么做实证研究。2020-12-22

猜你喜欢

大家都喜欢